eLearning Africa, 27-29 May 2009

This year’s eLearning Africa conference in Dakar, Senegal, starts on 27th May with pre-conference workshops and concludes on the evening of 29th May.  It promises to be an interesting opportunity to reflect on how best we can use e-learning to deliver on some of the continent’s biggest capacity development challenges.

The organisers suggest that the highlight will “include:

  • Discussion on the relative merits of one-to-one vs. shared computing which will feature in several sessions including a series of cases studies presented by SPIDER showcasing the way in which one-to-one computing has been realised in large scale equipment roll-outs in Rwanda, Ethiopia and Uruguay.
  • Debate about the extent to which open source solutions can be made sustainable. Are they the only solution for cash-strapped organisations or do they require a level of skills and resources not regularly found in colleges, universities and schools? Input on this topic will come from practitioners from the National Open University of Nigeria; MEF/IMSP, Benin; Makerere University, Uganda and many others.
  • The ongoing debate about the open educational movement in Africa will further develop this theme. Can the OER movement in Africa help to expand access to educational content for Africa’s resource-poor higher education institutions? Does it live up to its expectations? Presenters from OER Africa, the National University of Rwanda and the Shuttleworth Foundation in South Africa will present their experiences.
  • Mobile learning is of particular interest in Africa given the number of mobile devices available and the lack of reliable terrestrial Internet access. eLearning Africa 2009 features many interesting practical examples, such as m-learning for health-care workers, instigated by the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Belgium; mobile learning opportunities by l’Ecole Nomade in France; a study by the University of South Africa on the use of Mxit; and a partner programme of the Mid Sweden University and the Open University of Tanzania, using mobile phones to enhance in-service teacher training.
  • Affordable and reliable access solutions remain a challenge for most education and training practitioners in Africa. Presentation sessions in which access is discussed will include input from the Senegalese Government, the French Foreign Office, Computer Aid International and AfrISPA.
  • The results of new research led by IDRC’s PanAf Observatory will highlight the ways in which the pedagogical integration of ICTs can improve the quality of teaching and learning in Africa.
  • A discussion on the re-use and disposal of obsolete ICT equipment entitled E-Waste: Is Africa Heading for an Environmental Crisis? will feature a lively debate on issues around re-use and disposal of ICT equipment and the impact this has on the environment.
  • Dedicated sessions led by leading organisations active in this field including Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie (AUF), the World Bank, UNESCO and UNEP which will feature some of their projects, initiatives and successes.
  • There will be several inspirational case studies on the development of ICT4E policies, including presentations by IICD, The Netherlands, Ministère des Enseignements Secondaires, Cameroon, the University of Lagos, Nigeria and COFOPS-INTER, Cote D’Ivoire.
  • A special panel to highlight the eLearning initiatives of the Partnership for Higher Education in Africa, the South African Institute for Distance Education, and UCT’s Centre for Educational Technology. This panel will reflect on early lessons learned, explore specific educational technologies, introduce the emerging research agenda, and discuss how eLearning in African Higher Education can be advanced further.
  • University experience in putting in place effective technology- enhanced learning, which will feature presentations from universities including Université Cheikh Anta Diop dé Dakar, Senegal; University of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania; Université de Nouakchott, Mauritania; and École des Sciences de l’Information, Morocco. They and many others will provide first hand witness accounts of the opportunities and challenges they face.
  • Sessions on the ways in which ICT is being used to support teacher training and the skills of public servants which will include input from the Ministry of Education, Malawi, the University of Education, Winneba, Ghana and the University of British Columbia, Canada.”

WISE awards for outstanding educational achievement

LOGO WISEThe Qatar Foundation has recently announced the launch of its WISE (World Innovation Summit for Education) awards for outstanding educational achievements.  In this inaugural year, the WISE Awards nominations will generate six prizes to existing projects aligned with the Forum’s three main themes: Pluralism, Sustainability and Innovation.  Two prizes will be awarded for each of these three themes. Each of the six laureates will receive a WISE Prize Award of $20,000 at the Gala Dinner on November 17th, 2009. Laureates will also be given the opportunity to showcase their projects during the WISE Forum.

The WISE Awards application process is open to individuals or teams of individuals from across the world and in all education sectors, to be supported by a letter of endorsement from senior management of their organisations. The closing date for applications is 15th July 2009.

Laureates will be selected by a pre-jury and then by an International Jury consisting of some of the world’s leading experts in pluralism, sustainability and innovation in education, drawn from public institutions, civil society, the private sector, international organisations, universities and social entrepreneurs.

Further details are available as follows:

Maputo restaurants

Not everyone would automatically think of Mozambique for its culinary excellence – but for those who like fine seafood, Maputo’s restaurants are definitely worth exploring.  Mozambique is a forgiving country, and despite the violent war of independence it still retains certain classic Portuguese traditions, not least the tendency to serve rice and chips with most main courses.  It is also possible to find great Portuguese wines – definitely a step up from most of the South African onesprawns available on the wine lists.  Here are just a few of my favourite places to eat in Maputo:

  • Costa do Sol – on the coast to the north of Maputo – serves fantastic fresh seafood in an art deco atmosphere.  The vinhos verdes go down well with the lobster and prawns!
  • Restaurante Escorpião (Recinto da Feira Popular – Maputo. Tel. 21302180. E-mail: restauranteescorpiao@hotmail.com) – serves typical ‘Portuguese’ cuisine – and has one of the best collections of Portugese wine outside Portugal (try the Borba with one of the meat dishes).
  • Maputo Waterfront restaurante (Av 10 Novembro 74,http://www.paginasamarelas.co.mz/pag/2226032468_PAG_A.html) – serves excellent seafood and meat dishes – try one of the combination dishes, such as chicken and seafood.  As its name suggests, it is right on the waterfront
  • Restaurante 1908 (Av. Eduardo Mondlane,946 – Maputo. Tel. 21424834.) – a sophisticated restaurant in the centre of Maputo, serving Mozambican and Italian food.  As its name suggests it is in a building constructed in 1908!

World Press Freedom Day debate at the Frontline Club

01052009395The UK National Commission for UNESCO and the Press Freedom Network have convened today’s debate at the Frontline Club on the motion “Governments at war are winning the battle of controlling the international media”.  The proposers are Andrew Gilligan (Evening Standard) and Jamie Shea (Private Office of the Secretary General of NATO) and the opposers are Jeremy Dear (General Secretary, National Union of Journalists) and Alan Fisher (Al Jazeera English). William Horsley is the debate chair.

My interpretations of what was said by the speakers:

  • Wars create a sellers market in news; demand increases but supply reduces in times of war.  Wars are confusing.  It’s in the interest of those running the battle to keep things confused.  Embeds provide most of the reporting on ongoing wars as  in Afghanistan.  This makes news much more uncontroversial than they should be (Andrew Gilligan)
  • The voices of those suffering are given life by journalists.  War on terror has been accompanied by a war on civil liberties.  Journalists have risked their lives and been killed as they try to lift the veil of secrecy. Despite censorship, a complete blockade of news is not possible given the existence of mobile ‘phones, computers and the Internet (Jeremy Dear)
  • “No pictures, no news” – governments are quick learners.  Do governments make mistakes?  “Yes”.  Do they learn from their mistakes?  “Yes”.   Governments keep the journalists always occupied – keeping them in constant briefings, so they cannot go off and find out things for themselves! We no longer need to work through the media – governments create their own media networks – such as NATO TV.  Instead of using the press to get the message out, we now use pundits who are sympathetic to our cause. “Anyone can be his or her own journalist”. The profession has become democratised – so why cannot governments join in?  A good press helps those of us in government who believe in accurate information (Jamie Shea)
  • Journalists can now report immediately from the frontline; in the old days ‘geography’ mattered, but this is no longer true.  Governments are losing the battles because there are now more ways of accessing the truth than ever before – the bloggers and the twitters…  But the answer is not simply as a result of these new technologies.  Technology is one of our biggest assets – it is getting smaller and better all the time (Alan Fisher)

My thoughts and comments from the floor:

  • There was a tendency to imply that journalists are the arbiters of the truth.  But are they?  I think not.  We all bring parts of ourselves to the truths that we espouse.
  • A key theme, though, is the distinction between “independent journalism” and “public sector broadcasting” – independent voices are really important
  • I liked the comment from the floor that “journalists are concerned with their own greed”!
  • I echo the thoughts of a speaker from the floor who said that African governments are taking advantage of so-called press freedom – many African peoples do not have a choice
  • Much of the debate is indeed ethnocentric – despite global telecommunications
  • An African channel about whom the joke is “not wrong for long”!
  • Relationships between governments and the free press have to be based on mutual respect (Jamie Shea)
  • I would agree with Andrew Gilligan that very few people can actually get to the frontline of war zones – and therefore that professional journalists have a key role to play
  • I enjoyed Alan Fisher’s comments on the Georgia-Russia war – journalists on the ground can directly contradict what government spokespeople are saying
  • Do governments collude in disinterest? Is that why we don’t hear much about continuing violence in places such as DRC?
  • From the floor: “credibility has nothing to do with truth”
  • From the floor: “Deep in the Congo forest you cannot use your mobile ‘phone”.
  • From the floor: “In many countries, to get a SIM you still need to give your identity”
  • How many African countries really support freedom of the press?
  • In so many parts of the world, local journalists do not have the power actually to report because of government restrictions
  • Jeremy Dear emphasised the fundamental importance of journalists supporting each other in the face of oppression from governments
  • Andrew Gilligan: “bloggers have no credibility and little reach”

Who won the debate?  In favour: 38; Against: 15; Abstentions: 9.