Recent commentaries have largely focused on the negative aspects of the falling birth rate in many of the richer countries of the world, especially in Europe. A report by Robert Cuffe and Harriet Agerholm for the BBC thus emphasises the standard concerns over the implications for pensions, health and social care with the following words,
The growing ageing population “will add to pressure on the NHS, the state pension and the wider public finances”, said Stuart McDonald, head of longevity and demographic insights at pension consultants LCP.
“For the NHS, the challenge is not simply a larger population, but a larger population at ages associated with greater healthcare need.”
He added: “But for pensions, the projections will intensify an already difficult debate about whether people can realistically and fairly be expected to work longer.”
Sarah Scobie, Deputy Director of Research at the Nuffield Trust, warned end-of-life care services are “ill-prepared for an increase in deaths as the population ages overall”.
“Hospital care accounts for over 80% of public expenditure on health care for people in the last year of life, and most of that is spent on emergency care,” she said.
However, as I have argued elsewhere in 2023 in a slightly different context, there are many very positive aspects to declining population levels. Four factors stand out as being particularly important, especially in the UK:
First, and most obviously, falling populations place less pressure on our natural environment. All else being equal, falling populations place less demand for energy, for housing, for mining, and for transport, all of which are increasingly harming our precious environmental and landscape heritage.
Second, contrary to popular economic belief, it is not necessarily detrimental for the welfare of a state’s citizens if its economic growth rate falls. For too long, the success of countries has tended to be measured in terms of economic growth (often measured in GDP per capita), rather than human well-being. Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness Index is nevertheless an important reminder that there are indeed alternative measures. The reasons for the linkages between economic and demographic growth are clear, in that an increasing population provides both more labour (and thus production) and greater consumption (thus demand) (see Unwin, 2023) which benefits private sector companies that are the engines of growth. Focusing on equity rather than growth would lead to a completely different, and much fairer society.
Third, the development of new digital technologies, especially robotics and AI, and in the longer term CyborgAIns (see my Digital Inclusion in an Unequal World, 2026) is often decried as being detrimental to employment, but with falling populations that is exactly what we need. If these technologies are used significantly to increase productivity levels, then wise choices in their deployment (especially if they are used to deliver the roles that people are currently disinclined to perform) can readily counteract falling population levels.
Fourth, the apparent fetish for longevity amongst some of the Digital Barons, who are sinking fortunes into finding ways to extend their lives (see Varanasi, 2025), seems utterly misplaced. Death is the only certainty in Human life, and we need to focus instead on ensuring that the fewer lives being lived are indeed lived well.
We should be welcoming a decline in population with open arms rather than decrying it. A focus instead on Life, on Equity, on Nature, and on Technology (LENT) can transform the lived experiences of all our citizens for the better. The UK had the eighth highest population density in the world in 2025 among countries with populations over 50 million, at 285 people/sq km. In Europe, by contrast, Germany had 43 people/sq km fewer than the UK, Italy had 84 people/sq km fewer, France had 163 people/sq km fewer, and Spain had 188 people/sq km fewer, only about one-third the population density of the UK.
It is high time we had a completely different approach to demographic transition. We need to welcome declining populations as a golden opportunity to build fairer and better societies that are more in harmony with Nature.
Full drafts of all the 31 vignettes contributed by other leading researchers and practitioners (together witgh ajudio recordings of them reading their contributions)
Digital Inclusion in an Unequal World (Episode 4) – Pari Esfandiari’s contribution to “Nigel Hickson: a digital life well lived for others”
This is the fourth episode of our podcast based on the vignettes contributed by friends and colleagues to Tim Unwin’s new book Digital Technologies in an Unequal World: An Empancipatory Manfesto. Our dear friend and colleague, Nigel Hickson was to have written one of these vignettes based on his wealth of experience working on Internet Governance, especially for the British Government and ICANN, but his untimely death meant that he was unable to complete it. Instead, some of his friends have contributed very short pieces on what it was that made him so special, and a model to follow for anyone wishing to work at the policy level to ensure that the poorest and most marginalised can benefit from the use of digital tech. The full vignette can be read here.
Digital Inclusion in an Unequal World (Episode 5) – Domenico Fiormonte on “The Geopolitics of Digital Knowledge”.
This is the fifth episode of our podcast based on the vignettes contributed by friends and colleagues to Tim Unwin’s new book Digital Technologies in an Unequal World: An Empancipatory Manfesto. In it, Domenico asks the important question “So who has the power today to ‘represent’ digitally the world’s languages, the core of human cultures?”. He answers: “It is a group of Western, predominantly English-speaking and U.S.-based corporations”. However, he concludes optimistically that “the real Web is becoming multilingual and multicultural, regardless of all its hegemonic and mainstream representations”
Digital Inclusion in an Unequal World (Episode 6) – Mei Lin Fung on “Learning from Land Rights so Data Rights are Right from the Get Go”.
This is the sixth episode of our podcast based on the vignettes contributed by friends and colleagues to Tim Unwin’s new book Digital Technologies in an Unequal World: An Empancipatory Manfesto. In it, Mei Lin Fung suggests that “The painful history of poorly defined land rights, which in the past led to displacement through lack of formal documentation, offers a crucial lesson for the digital age”. She concludes optimistically that “We still have time to shape the digital future so that it reflects the dignity of everyone it touches — and ensures meaningful participation for anyone, anywhere”
The full vignette can be read in English here, and it can also be watched on video here.
Tendani Mulanga Chimboza on the exploitation of young women: digital tech at the heart of the immoral economy
This is the first episode of our podcast based on the vignettes contributed by friends and colleagues to Tim Unwin’s new book Digital Technologies in an Unequal World: An Empancipatory Manfesto. In it, Tendani highlights how digital tech is being used to exploit young women in southern Africa. The vignette can also be read here.
Marine Al Dahdah on The Digital Privatisation of India’s Administration
This is the second episode of our podcast based on the vignettes contributed by friends and colleagues to Tim Unwin’s new book Digital Technologies in an Unequal World: An Empancipatory Manfesto. In it, Marine focuses critically on aspects of the digital privatisation of India’s administrative systems. The vignette can also be read here.
Ken Banks on Memories of Innovation for the Most Marginalised
This is the third episode of our podcast based on the vignettes contributed by friends and colleagues to Tim Unwin’s new book Digital Technologies in an Unequal World: An Empancipatory Manfesto. In it, Ken focuses perceptively on the reasons why so many digital initiative notionally intended to help the poor often fail to do so. As he says “I worked for 15 years trying to give a voice to, and support, the work of grassroots organisations through digital tech, butmy frustration in a wider development system that didn’t seem to want to do what they knew was best for those they were meant to serve eventually forced me to step away”. The full vignette can be read here.
